O.J. Simpson Verdict

I know most of you have probably heard the verdict from just about every TV, Radio, and newspaper. My wife is Italian, and she reminded me of a famous old Italian saying:


“God has feet of lead, but sooner or later He around to everybody.”

I just love some of those old sayings.
Yours in Christ,
Job.




Posted under Uncategorized


Post written by admin on Saturday, December 6, 2008 at 4:37 PM

This post currently has no comments.

Post/Read Comments: O.J. Simpson Verdict


The “Merry Christmas” Season

I was wandering through the various forums that I have been known to frequent, and ran across an interesting website. Each Christmas we go through the usual pro/anti-Christmas wars, as we witness the disappearance of the traditional “Merry Christmas” greeting in the stores. One of the participants in the forum mentioned that he had recently set up a web site that listed businesses that still say “Merry Christmas” during the Christmas season. The name of the site, appropriately, is “The Merry Christmas Club”, and they have two easy to remember URL’s (website addresses, both URL’s forward to the same place):

www.TheMerryChristmasClub.com

www.MerryChristmasClub.com

During the pro/anti-Christmas wars each season, we have the usual debates about companies banning the Salvation Army and other Christian traditions and symbols, while still encouraging you to spend money in their stores… While boycotts are usually ineffective, I found this “Merry Christmas Club” spin on Christmas to be a positive message, for a positive season. They are currently focusing on South Carolina, but they are interested in expanding. I hope they do… I like the message.

On a different note, I will blog a bit about the election later, but for now our prayers are with the President-elect, even though we opposed many of the liberal worldly causes that he supports. The Bible says to pray for your leaders.

I think this “Merry Christmas Club” is a nice positive message to start off the season, and I pray that this friend’s website is a blessing and grows.

Yours in Christ,
Job




Posted under Uncategorized


Post written by admin on Thursday, December 4, 2008 at 12:56 PM

This post currently has no comments.

Post/Read Comments: The “Merry Christmas” Season


Vote For John McCain for President

I know…. most of you are shocked that the webservant (Job) of a conservative Christian website might support a candidate in the blog section that is pro-life, strong on national security, experienced, and has a solid history of saving money in government. Since our website is operating as an online Christian magazine (i.e., we are not a non-profit organization), then we are exercising our rights of freedom to speak out on issues that affect the Body. I will probably modify this message over the next few days stating the reasons why I am voting, as a Christian, for John McCain.

If the polls are correct, then I know that this is an unpopular view. Like a lot of Christians, I am surprised, and more than a bit disappointed, at the “polling” results for the upcoming election. Given the issues involved, like late-term abortion, assisted suicide (Washington State), murdering children *after* birth (Infanticide), gay marriage, security of the nation, economics, general moral decay and other issues, it would appear at this point that most Christians… according to the polls… are voting against the candidate that supports standard Christian views on these topics… and voting for a candidate that opposes standard Christian values.

There are many reasons why I am supporting John McCain, just a few of which are listed in the first sentence of this message. There are also many *many* reasons that motivate my belief that Barack Hussein Obama would be an extremely poor choice for President of the USA. Just *one* of the many reasons (don’t worry, you will hear more) is that Senator Obama, as we all know, has not yet served a SINGLE term in the U.S. Senate. It is time for people in the Church to wake up, and look at who they are voting into the most powerful office in the USA. In the *normal* world, a person applying for a job at a mid-level of management is expected to submit some kind of resume or job history, and of course this resume should show some record of positive accomplishment. Why is America, right now at a dangerous and risky time in economics and terror, willing to have looser standards for the President of the United States than most employers have for mid-level management in a medium sized corporation? Either the polls are wrong, or somehow the Church (all members in the Body of Christ) is being deceived into voting for things that they would *never* vote for in the past.

… and it is *not* John McCain’s fault that the economy has turned down… This great man has been thoroughly trashed by the Mainstream Media (MSM), like NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, New York Times, and the usual media powerhouses with their ultra-liberal agenda. Before the election, John McCain was known as a person that tried to reduce US Government waste. But I will have more to say about this later… as I edit this post.

I will expand on this section later…


Update: 10/30/08

I would like to make a few comments about media bias that relates to the previous message. Before the election John McCain was commonly regarded as a very moderate Republican (most would say he was a liberal Republican), and Obama was commonly regarded as an extremely liberal Democrat (his record shows he is the most liberal person in the Senate). Once the election season started, the public media began describing McCain as an extremist right wing fanatic, and Obama as a moderate. You do the math. The media has dropped any pretense of being a neutral reporter of the news, and is now nothing more than a paid arm of the Democrat party. These people have been poisoning the election atmosphere with their liberal views to the extent that they now blame *everything* on George Bush, and are now compounding that with guilt by association - namely, any person that ever agreed with Bush on anything is guilty.

This election is taking place during a major downturn in the economy. The damage to the economy was built into the system over a very long time… starting long before George Bush entered office. In particular the damage from the Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac government bailout was caused by the usual suspects known for high taxes and giving away free money. For those that are interested I would recommend googling “Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Congressional Hearings 2004″ (or click here for some youtube summaries). In these hearings the Democrats in Congress are strongly defending the practices of these institutions, while the Republicans were calling for controls. Now… back to the media… in the news today all we hear from the liberal media (NBC etc.) is that it is all George Bush’s fault. The problem was simple: the lenders were making home loans to people that could not afford homes, with encouragement from the big spenders in Congress… and you know who that is.

First of all, as a reminder of another root cause of these difficult economic times: we were attacked on 9/11/01. The resulting war had an extreme impact on our economy, and of course an even more extreme impact on our nation through the loss in lives. When you know that others want to attack you, you either need to be prepared as a nation to defend yourself, or be prepared to be overthrown, enslaved, or killed as a people. Until the Lord’s return, we need to realize that we live in a dangerous world. I believe that America’s response after the 9/11 attacks was appropriate. The Iraq war, while controversial, came about after MANY years of Saddam Hussein hiding his weapons programs and playing games with the inspectors. There was considerable evidence that Hussein had a program for developing Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) which had everybody concerned - including the Democrats. Hussein didn’t help matters by playing games with the inspectors and ignoring multiple UN resolutions over many years. There have also been numerous reports about these WMD being transferred to Syria from Iraq shortly before the war, so the truth has yet to come out on what really happened. The one thing we know for certain is that Saddam Hussein is no longer able to mass-murder his own people with chemical weapons, as he did before. This was an expensive war in both lives and economic terms that is now drawing to a close, although the world is entering a dangerous new phase of terrorism, and hints at a *new* Cold War. So when we think about the economic cost, let’s also keep this verse in mind:


For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
(Mark 8:36)


If the “polls” are correct, people seem to be casting away their standard Christian values in this election, and it appears that a large portion of this abandonment is based on “profit”. People are justifiably upset that the Government mismanaged the economy after a war and a no-risk below-cost house giveaway plan by the government. Well… I am upset too. That doesn’t mean that I plan to cast away all of my Christian values when picking out a leader for my country.

John McCain did NOT cause the economic downturn in the economy or your 401K, but as mentioned earlier has been known for trying to control and reduce government spending, which America needs right now. John McCain is also a centrist by nature, and in the past known for bringing people together. That is also what is needed at this time. I simply do not believe that Barack Hussein Obama can bring us together as a nation, or manage the economy well during an economic downturn.

This is something to think about when you walk into the voting booth and vote for the leader of the Free World, the most dangerous job on earth. Some of you may have lost considerable “wealth” in your 401K plans and other investments. This is hard, and the Lord understands this and will watch out for you. But of course, He also wants you to show your love for Him by acting the way He wants you to act. Just as you are called upon in your Church to make judgements and decisions, you are also called upon as a decision maker in this society to exercise reasonable judgement, by your vote, and choose leaders that believe in His ways.


Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.
(John 7:24)


The point of this is that we live in a dangerous world. A world that hates the way we live, and that hates our freedoms… including our religious freedoms. This is not the time to elect a “President-in-Training” with less that one term’s experience in the Senate. The above passage about judgement is especially relevant in this election since many people are making judgements about McCain based on false information from liberal media outlets like NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, New York Times, and others. As I said earlier in this message: I know this is not going to be a popular message if the polls are correct. Of course I have also said in the past that I have never tried to be popular… looks like I succeeded. There is really only one Person I want to be popular, and most thought about during this election: Jesus Christ.

Yours in Christ,
Job.




Posted under Uncategorized


Post written by admin on Monday, October 27, 2008 at 1:37 PM

This post currently has one comment.

Post/Read Comments: Vote For John McCain for President


A Romantic View of the Presidency is Dangerous

Having a romantic view of life and of history is fine for a dreamer, but  inexcusably dangerous for a nation. Through out this election cycle there has been a comparison between John Fitzgerald Kennedy and the Barack Hussein Obama, both men being firsts and both who engendered a “Camelot view” of the Presidency,

One of the first things that gets you in trouble with a romantic view of history, intentionally or unintentionally , is that if you get it wrong, you may well repeat the mistake. Let’s compare the two men before they ran for the job of leader of the free world.

Reader’s Digest (Sept. 2008) had interviews with both Obama and McCain. They introduce Obama with a comparison to John F. Kennedy.


“Obama was never a governor, nor an executive. He did not serve in the armed forces or the House of Representatives. He worked in the private sector only briefly as a lawyer and was never a judge or a prosecutor. He wrote one highly acclaimed memoir, Dreams from My Father, and a bestseller, The Audacity of Hope, which is essentially a campaign book. He served for three years as a community organizer in Chicago, taught law school, served eight years in the Illinois state legislature, and ran for the Senate in 2004, winning against a fringe candidate from out of state.That experience pales in comparison with John Kennedy’s life before the presidency. JFK had written two books, as well, but was also a decorated naval officer in World War II, had served three terms in the House, and was in his second Senate term when he earned the 1960 nomination. “




But that said, he does share points worth exploring

Let’s remember back to the elections of 1960 when Nixon and Kennedy were discussing meeting with foreign leaders with no preconditions. During the debates, Kennedy first addressed the subject of a possible summit with the Soviet Union in the second Kennedy-Nixon debate. Unlike Obama, Kennedy expressly rejected a summit without preconditions. Yet, once he was in office, Kennedy took another path. He wrote a letter that was secretly delivered to Khrushchev in March 1961, Kennedy expressed his willingness to meet Khrushchev “before too long” for an informal exchange of views. After the Bay of Pigs fiasco, Kennedy sensed that discussions without an agenda or prior agreement might be disadvantageous to the United States. He let the matter drop, but Khrushchev accepted the invitation on May 4. The meeting was to occur in Vienna late that spring.

Now remember, in Portland on May 18, Barack Obama is telling people that this meeting with Nikita Khrushchev in Vienna led to America’s triumph over the Soviet Union in the Cold War (Audio of Portland Speech). I am sorry but if that is Barack Obama’s understanding of history, he needs to get out of the race. Obama, no one cares about “your vision” for the world-especially the world! In addition to poor judgment, Obama has demonstrated that he doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Why?

Again, you must objectively study history and learn it’s lessons or you are bound to repeat your mistakes. “By all accounts, including Kennedy’s own, the meetings were a disaster. Khrushchev berated, belittled, and bullied Kennedy on subjects ranging from Communist ideology to the balance of power between the Soviet and Western blocs, to Laos, to “wars of national liberation,” to nuclear testing. He threw down the gauntlet on Berlin in particular, all but threatening war.

“I never met a man like this,” Kennedy subsequently commented to Time’s Hugh Sidey. “[I] talked about how a nuclear exchange would kill 70 million people in ten minutes, and he just looked at me as if to say ‘So what?’” In The Fifty-Year Wound, Cold War historian Derek Leebaert drily observes of Khrushchev in Vienna, “Having worked for Stalin had its uses.”

 

Kennedy sought a brief final session with Khrushchev to clear the air regarding Berlin. In that final meeting at the Soviet embassy, however, Khrushchev bluntly told Kennedy, “It is up to the U.S. to decide whether there will be war or peace.” Kennedy responded, “Then, Mr. Chairman, there will be war. It will be a cold winter.” On this unhappy note the two leaders’ only face-to-face meeting came to an end.

Immediately following the final session on June 4 Kennedy sat for a previously scheduled interview with New York Times columnist James Reston at the American embassy. Kennedy was reeling from his meetings with Khrushchev, famously describing the meetings as the “roughest thing in my life.” Reston reported that Kennedy said just enough for Reston to conclude that Khrushchev “had studied the events of the Bay of Pigs” and that he had “decided that he was dealing with an inexperienced young leader who could be intimidated and blackmailed.” Kennedy said to Reston that Khrushchev had “just beat [the] hell out of me” and that he had presented Kennedy with a terrible problem: “If he thinks I’m inexperienced and have no guts, until we remove those ideas we won’t get anywhere with him. So we have to act.”  (link) That is how we ended up in Viet Nam-Kennedy had something to prove at the expense of 50,000 of our troops lives…Camelot….

Lets not forget though, how the US was berated after that by the Soviet Union and how JFK’s inexperience almost got us into nuclear war:


Khrushchev to John F. Kennedy

Dear Mr. President,

…. Imagine, Mr. President, what if we were to present to you such an ultimatum as you have presented to us by your actions. How would you react to it? I think you would be outraged at such a move on our part. And this we would understand.
 
Having presented these conditions to us, Mr. President, you have thrown down the gauntlet. Who asked you to do this? By what right have you done this? Our ties with the Republic of Cuba, as well as our relations with other nations, regardless of their political system, concern only the two countries between which these relations exist. And, if it were a matter of quarantine as mentioned in your letter, then, as is customary in international practice, it can be established only by states agreeing between themselves, and not by some third party. Quarantines exist, for example, on agricultural goods and products. However, in this case we are not talking about quarantines, but rather about much more serious matters, and you yourself understand this.
 
His Excellency
 
Mr. John F. Kennedy President of the United States of America
 
Washington
 
You, Mr. President, are not declaring a quarantine, but rather issuing an ultimatum, and you are threatening that if we do not obey your orders, you will then use force. Think about what you are saying! And you want to persuade me to agree to this! What does it mean to agree to these demands? It would mean for us to conduct our relations with other countries not by reason, but by yielding to tyranny. You are not appealing to reason; you want to intimidate us.
 
No, Mr. President, I cannot agree to this, and I think that deep inside, you will admit that I am right. I am convinced that if you were in my place you would do the same.
 
…. This Organization [of American States] has no authority or grounds whatsoever to pass resolutions like those of which you speak in your letter. Therefore, we do not accept these resolutions. International law exists, generally accepted standards of conduct exist. We firmly adhere to the principles of international law and strictly observe the standards regulating navigation on the open sea, in international waters. We observe these standards and enjoy the rights recognized by all nations.
 
You want to force us to renounce the rights enjoyed by every sovereign state; you are attempting to legislate questions of international law; you are violating the generally accepted standards of this law. All this is due not only to hatred for the Cuban people and their government, but also for reasons having to do with the election campaign in the USA. What morals, what laws can justify such an approach by the American government to international affairs? Such morals and laws are not to be found, because the actions of the USA in relation to Cuba are outright piracy. This, if you will, is the madness of a degenerating imperialism. Unfortunately, people of all nations, and not least the American people themselves, could suffer heavily from madness such as this, since with the appearance of modern types of weapons, the USA has completely lost its former inaccessibility.
 
Therefore, Mr. President, if you weigh the present situation with a cool head without giving way to passion, you will understand that the Soviet Union cannot afford not to decline the despotic demands of the USA. When you lay conditions such as these before us, try to put yourself in our situation and consider how the USA would react to such conditions. I have no doubt that if anyone attempted to dictate similar conditions to you — the USA, you would reject such an attempt. And we likewise say — no.
 
The Soviet government considers the violation of the freedom of navigation in international waters and air space to constitute an act of aggression propelling humankind into the abyss of a world nuclear-missile war. Therefore, the Soviet government cannot instruct captains of Soviet ships bound for Cuba to observe orders of American naval forces blockading this island. Our instructions to Soviet sailors are to observe strictly the generally accepted standards of navigation in international waters and not retreat one step from them. And, if the American side violates these rights, it must be aware of the responsibility it will bear for this act. To be sure, we will not remain mere observers of pirate actions by American ships in the open sea. We will then be forced on our part to take those measures we deem necessary and sufficient to defend our rights. To this end we have all that is necessary.
 
Respectfully, /s/ N. Khrushchev
 
N. KHRUSHCHEV
 
Moscow 24 October 1962   (link)


What is naive Obama’s next stated strategy? Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory in Iraq. Why?  Because Iraq makes him personally look bad if we win. And where is the ten billion dollars a month savings he talks about (from Iraq) going to go? Not back in the coffers. He is going to take the troops from Iraq and place them in Afghanistan and perhaps nuclear Pakistan.  That is not savings, that is troop realignment by a naive inexperienced junior senator.

This isn’t a romance novel we are reading, or a world we wish would be that starts out with Once upon a time… this is reality. This is not time for on the job training, or a romantic worldview. We are in currently in two wars; with Russia and a nuclear Iran on the rise.  America is not in the position to trust it’s fate and future to some romanticized notion that the naive junior Senator Barack Obama is up to the job .




Posted under 2008 Presidential Race, Politics

Euthenasia on Washington State Ballot

Most of us have been caught up in the economic news and US National election news to take time to look at some of the local ballots. Our “home base” for this website is Washington State, one of the most liberal states in the nation, so we have been fighting an uphill battle for years at the local level. I got a phone call today from one of those political polling agencies that call looking for opinions on state ballot measures. Normally I don’t even answer these phone calls but for some reason I did this time. It quickly became obvious that I was speaking with another believer conducting the poll. It never ceases to amaze me where I meet people in the Body… The lady that was calling was asking my opinion on Initiative 1000, which would legalize physician assisted suicide in the state of Washington. Those of you that have browsed our site have probably read our views on abortion, and can probably guess what our views are on physician assisted suicide.

This is *precisely* what this election is about: Issues that affect the Body of Christ. We will be adding comments over the next few weeks, trying to wake up the American electorate to some of the things taking place in this society - and the ways these things impact the Church. One of the things that concerns me about this election is the large number of people in the Church voting for issues and candidates that are not well aligned with Biblical truth. Although the stock market and 401k investments may be going through tough times, that is certainly no reason to give up on Biblical Truth, or turn away from Biblical principles at the ballot box.

So let’s talk about that over the next few weeks.

Yours in Christ,
Job.




Posted under Uncategorized


Post written by admin on Monday, October 20, 2008 at 1:32 AM

This post currently has no comments.

Post/Read Comments: Euthenasia on Washington State Ballot


House Fails to Pass Bill, Dow Drops 777 Points

I just heard this on the business news, and I thought some of you might find it interesting:

Cost of package in Congress to *begin* fixing economic mess: $700 Billion
Drop in today’s TOTAL value in the stock market: $1,400 Billion
Change in the Value of the Dow Jones Industrial Average: 777 points




For the fact checkers out there, I heard this on CNBC on Sept. 29, 2008, after market close.


So the loss in value in today’s market drop is over TWICE the value of the package.

whew…


For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.

2 timothy 1-7, KJV




Blessings,
Job




Posted under Uncategorized


Post written by admin on Monday, September 29, 2008 at 5:58 PM

This post currently has no comments.

Post/Read Comments: House Fails to Pass Bill, Dow Drops 777 Points


MSNBC Attacks The Church

As most of you know, this site has always been about unity in Christ through essential Christian doctrine. We have never shied away from criticizing cult-like religions like mormonism, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and others, since they fall outside the pale of orthodoxy, but we stand strongly “arm in arm” with those that are part of the genuine Church - the Body of Christ. Indeed, criticizing cult-like religions and defending the true faith is part of our obligation to contend for the faith as described in scripture:


   3Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.

   4For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

Jude 3-4



The essentials of our faith are not difficult to understand. Martin Luther once said that the essential messages of the Bible are so clear that a child can understand them. Although cults and false teachings have been around since the beginning, we feel compelled to come to the defense of those that attack the true Church. Most of us have minor differences in our Christian beliefs even within the same Church organization. While I am not a member of the Assemblies of God, I feel led to come to their defense since I consider the organization as part of mainstream Christendom. We may have our occasional disagreements in doctrine within the Church and between denominations, but these are differences within the family. The constant ongoing attacks against the Church by the Obama campaign and MSNBC have crossed that line that should never be crossed, and they are now attacking my brothers and sisters in Christ. Apparently the “god” of MSNBC and Barack Hussein Obama believes in abortion, infanticide, gay marriage, and all the other causes embraced by the ultra-liberal left.


MSNBC Mocks the Church


The supposed “Separation between Church and state” (not in the Constitution) is now being used by media bigots like MSNBC to convince Christians that we should have no say in politics. Apparently the Assemblies of God denomination is not “good enough” for the heathen based MSNBC, obsessed with all things liberal. It is not just “important” for Christians to be involved in government, it is vital, and when Christians stop protecting their rights as guaranteed by the FIRST amendment to the US Constitution, those rights disappear.


Contend for the Faith


MSNBC has been routinely trashing Christianity in general for quite some time, and holding up some denominations to ridicule that demonstrates its true belief system, and points to the master to whom MSNBC reports. The reason for these recent attacks, of course, are based on Sarah Palin’s prior membership in this Church. These personal attacks and sexist insults coming from MSNBC and the Obama campaign should be warning signs to fellow Christians. Remember that the next target of the MSNBC and Obama smear machine just might be YOU and YOUR CHURCH.

When you attack a brother in Christ you attack me too… so yes, I take this attack personally, even if I am not a member of the Assemblies of God Church. Based on the vicious and bigoted attacks by MSNBC and its parent organization NBC on the Church, and their clear abandonment of any pretense of being a source of unbiased news, we would like to encourage readers to boycott this media tool of the Socialist party. Given its last place in the ratings, it sounds like many of you have already made that decision.



In His service,
Job




Posted under Uncategorized


Post written by admin on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 1:03 AM

This post currently has one comment.

Post/Read Comments: MSNBC Attacks The Church


Obama’s lack of curiosity is becoming a liability

 

Obama Ad Hits McCain for Being Computer Illiterate

Barack Obama steps in it~~again!  Barack Hussein Obama II certainly is demonstrating his superior lack of judgement for all to see. Do we want someone who is commander-in-chief to look at “facts” and make judgements with no background knowledge, or has no curiosity as to why? It appears his lack of curiousity is also highlighting a  severe lack of his management capabilities. If he was curious, he would have asked why John Mc Cain doesn’t use email before spent peoples hard earned money running it!

 

As the Boston Globe notes 0n March 4, 2000:

“McCain gets emotional at the mention of military families needing food stamps or veterans lacking health care. The outrage comes from inside: McCain’s severe war injuries prevent him from combing his hair, typing on a keyboard, or tying his shoes. Friends marvel at McCain’s encyclopedic knowledge of sports. He’s an avid fan - Ted Williams is his hero - but he can’t raise his arm above his shoulder to throw a baseball.”

To make matters worse, it happens that John does use the internet, and certainly understands the importance of it, according to this interview in the NY Times (link) on July 13,2008.

While this certainly once again highlights Senator Obama’s poor judgement and analytical skills, it also highlights something much more important. It highlights how lacking Senator Barack Obama is in life experience in his management skills, of which one of the most important aspects will be his time management skills and judgement.

Senator Mc Cain has  proven leadership experience in the US Navy where he had to manage and delegate responsibilities. Senator Mc Cain has  also expressed in interviews that he prefers to talk to people over written communication. Anyone involved in management today can tell you the many problems that are encountered in dealing with issues via e-mail, because of how often they are misinterpreted. In fact, the standard managerial advice is NOT to email people about important issues, as they lack intonation, facial expression and the run the risk of  being misinterpreted.

Again, we really don’t expect Senator Obama to understand this because of his inexperience in management, but every time we forget he reminds us once again, when it comes to executive matters– he does not even grasp the position he is seeking!




Posted under 2008 Presidential Race, Politics


Post written by John on Saturday, September 13, 2008 at 5:59 AM

This post currently has 2 comments.

Post/Read Comments: Obama’s lack of curiosity is becoming a liability


Remembering the 9/11 Attacks from the “Religion of Peace”: Islam

This is the seventh anniversary of the attacks on America by the subscribers to the so called “religion of peace”. I just thought some of you needed a little reminder of this FACT:









Here was the reaction in the Muslim world to the death of thousands, with cheers going up and celebration candy being passed out on the streets:










“Teach your children well” indeed. Don’t think for a minute that the “religion of peace” is finished attacking America.

Of course the perpetrators of this act of war are now burning in hell… and still looking for those “72 virgins” in their fiery new home for eternity. Their is only ONE faith that will keep YOU from joining them in their home in hell: Christianity.

Jesus said “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but through Me.” (John 14:6)

God bless you all,
Job.




Posted under Uncategorized


Post written by admin on Thursday, September 11, 2008 at 4:59 PM

Tags:
This post currently has one comment.

Post/Read Comments: Remembering the 9/11 Attacks from the “Religion of Peace”: Islam


World Did Not End Yesterday - CERN Paranoia

The CERN “Large Hadron Collider” paranoia has really taken the world by storm. This is the world’s biggest particle accelerator (atom smasher) that just went online, and some were concerned that it would destroy the earth.

When I was a grad student in the Stanford Physics department I used to jog around the electron-positron storage rings without a worry (of course not while it was running). I suppose there were people that were worried that the Stanford accelerator could destroy the world. The important thing for physicists to keep in mind is that we need to provide assurances that we are not going to destroy the world. Since the beginning of “science” the story has been the same: fear of the unknown. That is not a *bad* thing, but excessive unwarranted fear is a problem when unchecked.

When the Fission Bomb was being developed during World War II there was some concern that the bomb would ignite the atmosphere and destroy the earth. Needless to say, the predictions were wrong, but work apparently stopped while the review of the equations was made:

Edward Teller Obit - Igniting the Atmosphere

A little caution is always necessary, but paranoia is never necessary. Outside the physics community it is natural to have concerns about what the scientists are up to, but we need to also be careful to not stifle progress. None of us know *what* benefits will accrue from these experiments, but understanding the way God designed the universe works will have benefits. Of that we can be assured.

I responded yesterday to a message about four earthquakes, and whether they were caused by the Large Hadron Collider. Don’t worry. Earth quakes of varying magnitudes are regular, albeit seemingly random events. I think the earth quakes were more likely caused by my car breakdown, and the consequent towing across that floating bridge we have in Seattle. That released more total energy than what is going on in CERN. The big difference, of course, is that we are focusing a lot of energy in a very small volume of spacetime, all trying to understand God’s creation. There are bigger things to worry about out there.


Here is a funny video about the Large Hadron Collider:



Remember, the Lord has not given us a spirit of fear… so let’s not have a repeat of the famous Galileo controversy when he used the telescope to peer out into the night sky, and noticed that the earth appeared to be in orbit around the sun. Objecting to Galileo’s discovery was not one of the Church’s finest moments.




Posted under Uncategorized


Post written by admin on Thursday, September 11, 2008 at 3:26 PM

Tags:
This post currently has no comments.

Post/Read Comments: World Did Not End Yesterday - CERN Paranoia